PREVENT PROJECT MELTDOWNS

by Yasushi Kusume 

 

 Typically, people don’t have sufficient data to determine that, so they try to settle the debate –creative chaos versus planning – with stories. 

 

How Big Things Get Done, Bent Flyvbjerg and Dan Gardner,


 


Every now and then, I come across a project plan so wildly optimistic, it borders on reckless. I’m sure you know the type: trying to deliver something no one on the team has ever done before—and in half the usual time.

But somehow the team always rallies behind this wild new idea. “We’ll make it work!” they chant. They convince themselves that a bold new method will emerge—somehow. And then? The unforeseen complications that bedevil every project everywhere arise, it ends up delayed by more than a year, burns through the budget, and everyone involved is left wondering how it all went so wrong.

Disciplined planning

Before we go further, let’s define what I mean by ‘project’. I’m not just talking about product development or business launches. For me, a project is any initiative with a clear goal, deadline, and budget — whether it’s implementing a new HR system, redesigning performance reviews, or fixing quality control processes.

Here’s the strange thing, though: inside the same company getting behind the aforementioned, wildly optimistic plan, routine projects such as updating a product line or setting next year’s budget are often handled with great care. Structured processes are in place. Goals are realistic. Budgets are respected.

Yet when it comes to that one-off, high-uncertainty challenge? Out go structure and realistic goals and in comes ‘we’ll figure it out as we go’ as the strategy. It’s a movie I’ve seen far too many times.

And yet there is a theory that defends such reckless optimism.


The case for bold ignorance?

In How Big Things Get Done, authors Bent Flyvbjerg and Dan Gardner talk about the ‘Hiding Hand Principle’, a term coined by economist Albert O. Hirschman in 1967.

The idea is this: if people knew all the obstacles to a project in advance, they’d never start. But by not knowing, they launch into action—and when they inevitably hit the wall, they’re forced to get creative and solve problems in ways they never imagined.

In other words, ignorance becomes a kind of unintentional motivator. We underestimate the challenges, but also our own resourcefulness — so once the heat’s on, we rise to the occasion. In some cases, the end value of the project even outweighs the delays and budget blowouts.


Kahneman’s warning

That said though, let’s not get too cozy with such a narrative, comforting as it may be. In his book Thinking, Fast and Slow, Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman warns us about the seductive dangers of hindsight and overconfidence.

He believes we often misread what really caused success. We fall victim to the ‘Halo Effect’. This is the tendency to let a positive impression about one aspect of an individual (or product or brand, etc.) influence our judgement of the whole individual. For instance, if they look neat and tidy and well-cared for, we might well be tempted to believe that also applies to their character. Even if, in reality, they’re a crook.

So the Halo Effect lets us ignore all the failures — caused by bad design, bad planning, over-optimism — that didn’t make the cut. We overemphasize lucky breaks and forget about the 99 similar projects that quietly flopped because they were badly planned, etc. In a world that celebrates winners, failures vanish from memory like deleted emails.


Unlocking creativity

And while Flyvbjerg and Gardner believe that ignorance can motivate, they’re not fans of the Hiding Hand Principle. Even though the data says most bold projects fail, it’s the heroic success stories that we remember. It's the same reason we obsess over plane crashes but shrug off car accidents, even though the latter are more frequent and dangerous. And the Halo Effect is why we keep repeating mistakes.

Their conclusion? Meticulous planning doesn’t kill creativity. It unlocks it. A world-renowned, prize-winning architect like Frank Gehry doesn’t wing his original, groundbreaking masterpieces — he plans obsessively so that he never ends up boxed in by disaster.


Face the unknown

So what does proper planning actually look like? I’d argue it comes down to three things:

  1. Admit what you don’t know. Before it bites you later.
  2. Name every possible obstacle. If something might derail progress, identify it now.
  3. Spotlight problems. Even if you don’t have answers yet, get them out of the shadows.

You won’t solve everything up front. But acknowledging the complexity of your project before you begin is the first true step toward success.


Final thoughts

Stories about ‘lucky ignorance’ and last-minute brilliance make for great TED Talks. But they’re not strategies. They’re anecdotes. When facing the unknown, don’t just charge ahead and hope that magic will strike. Instead, step back. Think it through. Preparation doesn’t kill ambition—it enables it.

Above all, remember this: Thoughtful planning takes time. You need, as the old saying goes, to, ‘Go slow to go fast’. So take the time upfront to lay a smart foundation. Do that, and you’ll move faster when it really matters.